Yann, Apparently there is problems with the 4.24a software and I understand that a corrected version of the 4.24a has been supplied to some dealers.

Stuart, I can confirm that the picture on the right is a Mark I phone. Your picture actually means that B&O did make a Mark I pyramid wall charger and yours is the first one I have seen.

Well, the current number of members on Beoworld which have greek e-mail addresses, ones that end in .GR is 23 There may well be others, but that is a guide for you.

You should certainly be excited, but I would not be so excited about lifting 123kg up and down stairs !!

Steve, You are correct it is a network routing issue at Sprint and it will have effected many customers.. sl-webmar-131143-0.sprintlink.net (82.195.191.114) server is located in London and the Beoworld Server is in Slough.

I can confirm Peter's statement, I have done it myself.

Spiros and other members, Sorry you were having problems connecting to the main Beoworld web site. There have been problems on recent days connecting to the Beoworld site because sprint has been having some networking routing problems here in the UK which effected many customers including Beoworld. This forum is un-effected because it runs on a server

Stuart, I standby my previous statement. The bases of the Mark I & Mark II are as below It should be noted that if you place a Mark II phone on a Mark I base it will not fit because of the extra plastic around the pins as shown in the left picture above. However a Mark I phone WILL fit onto a Mark II base. That is why people think that the new type

Stuart, B&O did not produce as far as I am aware a wall charger for the Mark I Beocom 6000 like the current wall charger. The Mark I & Mark II have different charging lugs at the bottom of the phone.

Certainly, if you have a plasma screen in the same room as the Lutron it will dramatically reduce the IR sensitivity.