Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and 1st March February 2012

 

Search

Page 14 of 16 (158 items) « First ... < Previous 12 13 14 15 16 Next >
  • Re: high definition dvd

    sorry, double post :(
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-31-2007
  • Re: high definition dvd

    Here is the present day: http://www.digitaltvnews.net/content/?p=1790 So, maybe B&O's choice was the """wrong""" Korean partner, because Samsung is BD only :( but, maybe... a new year, a new wish: Let the peace rule 2008 all over the World...! ps.: ...and, if possible, in the format wars also ;)
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-31-2007
  • Re: I am disappointed about beovision 8

    tom: And then, you must not forget that the BV8 is meant to be a "low budget" set and therefore per example has a less good picture quality as the BC6. I noticed that in the shop, but I didn't mind because I knew that the BV8 was an entry level TV. I think, that's a point, I do not like in the B&O marketing strategy, and in the
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-31-2007
  • Re: I am disappointed about beovision 8

    beoplayer: For example, HD-DVD, Bluray or HD-digital televison. Just some notes... First, and just for fun, these formats are not supported by B&O, so first You must purchase at least an HD player from a different brand, which means: The full integration fails immediately, You can't get any HD feeling from any B&O player system. And, secondly
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-31-2007
  • Re: Happy New Year to All !!

    To add a not listed one, in hungarian we say: "Boldog új Évet Kívánok - or usually in short term: BUÉK! "
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-31-2007
  • Re: Happy New Year to All !!

    A very Happy New Year to all :)
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-31-2007
  • Re: Does anybody know why B&O has got such a bad name ?

    Just for fun, this topic starts to be looking exactly the same as an audiophile forum. A religion war. The fate in B&O against to the arguments, against to the rest of the world, against to the facts, against to anything else. I do not wish to take a part in it, not even on an audiophile forum (yes, I used to go there also), and not in here. I simply
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-29-2007
  • Re: Does anybody know why B&O has got such a bad name ?

    "Ofcourse there are plenty of people who now B&O is about the passion and the nice design combined with a good sound or vision and not only the sound or vision, but that group of people is becomming smaller and smaller. So I thougth, if B&O send out some stuff to shows, people can see what B&O is all about and it will repair his name
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-29-2007
  • Re: Does anybody know why B&O has got such a bad name ?

    "Don't agree. In my view the BL5 is if anything under priced and they have been reviewed most favourably. Have a look here . I certainly think that it is the bargain in the present range. But speakers will divide opinion and each to their own." I'am totally agree with the last sentence - and therefore I told, if somebody prefer the
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-29-2007
  • Re: Does anybody know why B&O has got such a bad name ?

    Under £70k? Sorry, I do not know the english price list, but I think this is a very easy bet... here are some ideas from the current speakers: Active speaker category: Martin Logan Purity for £2090. (also a good looking one!) Thickness: Podium Model1 for $8000 US (sweedish design ;) ) Design ideas: Waterfall Audio Victoria EVO for $5400
    Posted to General Forum (Forum) by AT on 12-29-2007
Page 14 of 16 (158 items) « First ... < Previous 12 13 14 15 16 Next >