robc4674: Nice to see people thinking laterally tho! Rob Rob, after owning the TV for two years and discussing with your dealer, the very first thing you would think of was the distance between yourself and the TV! LCD technology shows everything 'as is'. If you sit, say, 1.5 metres away from a 40" LCD TV, the quality will be poor. Move

robc4674: The problem is that I am made to feel as tho I am the only one complaining in the UK. However, I issued another thread about the DTV modules not working correctly But that's not an objective issue - that's a fault with the module (hardware or software). ie. if you lined up 10 people, all 10 would experience the problem. Yes, send the

robc4674: My argument is thus - if I go up the road and buy a sony 40" - you can not see the same problem. Therefore the B&O set, whilst may be of better qulaity, is not fit for purpose? My friend who is a local magistrate has agreed that I only need to demonstrate what a layman would expect from a TV. Namely a good picture with no lag. The

robc4674: I would note that I went into the delaer last year with the DVD's. The problem was visable on their beovision 7-40 sets, but only half of us (6 people were watching) could see the lag! Maybe its my glasses!!!! If that's the case, then there might not be a problem with your TV but across the range. Perhaps it's objective problem

Mr10Percent: Maybe they should just slash £2000 off the price of a BV7-40 and throw-in a pair of BL5's for free? No need to be sarcastic. We just disagree. If you believe the 4's are the way forward, fair enough.

I disagree. I don't think a pair of BL4's would offer an excellent audio experience without a centre speaker. Also, the BV7 doesn't look right without the 7.4 or 7.2. A while back I had my BV7-32 with just the BL6000s connected (7.1 was back for repair) and the sound was terrible. Just didn't sound right - poor version of the 7.2. I

I agree Alex. Who thought that through? B&O should sell the BV7 with a mono centre speaker (7.4) and then simply enable customers to purchase speakers to compliment their TV. If they purchase with the TV, they ought to give them an incentive. But why on earth would anyone want a BV7 with 4000s? BL4000s are 'bookshelf' speakers, wouldn't

robc4674: When I showed the letter to the UK marketing team, I suggested that as a layman buying a tv, I think the TV should give a good quality picture similar to lesser brands who do not suffer the same problem (we have tried and they are fine!). Their final sentence was 'we are the best in the world, bring it on' (paraphrased!). Rob, can

No, I've not experienced that and I used to own the first MKI BV7-32 (now the BV7-40). Yes, camera panning can be a little frustrating, but it's certainly acceptable. I have a poor basic old analogue signal as a 'backup' and camera panning is ok. The only problem I have/had with poor SD signals is grain around moving objects - sport

cjocc: In todays webcast the CEO had on the slide more detail of the "modularised" BV 7: Monitor, add DVD/B, Speaker but also had 100Hz Any clue on in which order and when these will be out? How long have the Retailer known that this is coming B&O told us themselves - in February 2008 - that they were going to update the BV7-40 with a