[quote user="moxxey"] Puncher, I wouldn't get your hopes up re. LED backlighting on the BV7-40. B&O have a history of using older 'tried and tested' Samsung panels and I'd guess the design of the backlit panel may not lend itself to the existing BV7-40 case. They've only *just* implemented 100Hz, when they were already

[quote user="nisrani"] [quote user="stefan"] [quote user="nisrani"] maybe you can try it some where and hear the diffrents maybe the bl 5 is supreme in stereand in 5.1 they don t get the right signal to preform [/quote] I have both, a surround setup with BL5 and a stereo setup with BL8000/BL2 and I can confirm the BL5 setup

[quote user="Razlaw"] This is all very confusing and technical to me. To add to my confusion, I will ask a question. We have iTunes on a PC connected by Beoport to the Masterlink system. We also have Apple TV connected to our BV7 MKIII by both HDMI and analog. (I wanted HDMI to the BV7 but needed analog if I wanted to use the Apple TV in link

Not sure if this tells us anything but just perused the Samsung (UK) site and looked up the first price for the different "series" Samsung LCDTV panels on Google - 3 series - £450 4 series - £440 5 series - £464 6 series - £679 (incl. 100Hz) 7 series - £819 100Hz Motion Plus CCFL Backlight 84.7mm 8 series - £909

[quote user="nisrani"] Hello i will try it in another store but i think the problem is they don t get realy the .1 signal they are very good also with out the .1 signal but when you like to watch movies you will hear the difrence i thought maybe there is a solution to sent the.1 signal to the bl5 just like the bl2 [/quote] I'm sure the

[quote user="moxxey"] [quote user="rednik"] Are you really saying "let's wait and see" when you've ordered the MKIV? [/quote] I think you misunderstand the discussion. I mean 'let's wait and see if it has LED backlighting or whether B&O would be stupid to launch that feature with their mid-range LCD

[quote user="nisrani"] maybe you can try it some where and hear the diffrents maybe the bl 5 is supreme in stereand in 5.1 they don t get the right signal to preform [/quote] No - I'm sure there are many satisfied BL5 owners here (not me unfortunately) who will testify to their outstanding performance in "5.1" mode (although

Is that a fake "Congratulations, Lee." note, they sell for peanuts on ebay!

[quote user="soundproof"] I agree that it's often very hard to discern any difference between 16/44.1 and 24/96kHz - however, I think the threadstarter may have experienced differences, even with the downsample, because many of the tracks that are sold at higher resolutions are actually better produced, because they are intended for the

[quote user="Michael"] Well I guess I have an incentive to hook up that Mac Mini although it sounds like my ears probably can't hear the difference. [/quote] But it does serve to illustrate an entirely different point - different versions of the same album can sound significantly different, certainly if buying "back catalogue"