"Where`s the love??" Lost in space. "Sorry to say this, but it seems to me that almost everything B&O does get you all hyped up with negativity." You know, if there are so much people says negativity about them from the fan club - what do You expect from the others? I think it worth at least a minute to think about it at B&O

Personaly I do not like SACD. But, it's not about the taste, but a feeling: To create a player, that is able to play any kind of a compact disc. Currently, there is nothing on the market like this, because it could be too expensive for the common market. But in the premium region? Let's see it this way: "B&O - just put your disc in

"The whole Blue-Ray/HD DVD thing isn't actually as simple as it seems, because both systems use a different laser." A HD/BR combo costs less then GBP 500, a noname SACD/DVD-A/CD player costs GBP 20... what is the problem to purchase them? Nothing. Does B&O has a relationship with these firms? Yes. If You can have an integrated HD/BR

I think, there is nothing more to say about why a CEO was removed - the graph "says" everything. His job failed, the shareholders lost a lots of money. They want at least heads. The facts shows, this is not a short term problem, but an acute, real big problem, what Torben B. was not able to solve. He had more then enough time to try it, but

Alex: But then its all about design again. Or not ? Good point. IMHO currently B&O mostly want to sell their products only by the design, and that's the problem: It's not enough. A B&O must be an artwork. For me, it means not just a good design, but a real timeless design, and also a technological perfection. IMHO You also must feel

Dude1: Also, products like the BV8 which are'nt too bad for the $ comparison allow people who have had MX etc TV's and older to update to a simple, good looking LCD tv and have a simple to use interface and great sound with a good picture. I'am totally disagree. For example I have an MX TV, but never ever in my mind was a doubt on keep it

redfresnel: In my opinion it's great that B&O has been careful with which formats to include in their systems. There has been much less formats in the past and it has probably been an easier decision with formats in the earlier days. But for example it was a good choice not make BETA recorder after VCR, even though beta is more proffesional

soundproof: I feel that a few critics are making the mistake of focusing too much on price, relative to a brand that is operating in the premium-to-luxury market. IMHO, for this You must have premium-to-luxury product. The luxury price is not enough to make something special. soundproof: I can get a meal at Burger King, or I can go to El Bulli. Unfortunately

Bingo: Does somebody know the solution? Yes, IMHO it's not so complicated in this case. Let's start to create whole systems, with genuine look, and with breathtaking solutions. As B&O did, and B&O used to do. After this, they could easily price any products, but without it, IMHO the brand name added royalty in this case is a little bit

Is it care?