|
Untitled Page
ARCHIVED FORUM -- April 2007 to March 2012 READ ONLY FORUM
This is the first Archived Forum which was active between 17th April 2007 and
1st March February 2012
Search
-
[quote user="Peter "] Very nice example - that really is quite a find - especially if it all works as well. I think they do best if they are used regularly. [/quote] I bought it unseen, so when I visited the seller to pick it (the receiver, not the seller) up my jaw dropped - I didn't expect it to be in such great condition. I'm glad
-
[quote user="beaker"]Its amazing how something can look "retro" and futuristic at the same time.[/quote] Yes, it's like it is from a future that never was. This is in my opinion the most beautiful Beomaster, a true design masterpiece. I love the looks of my 6000/8000 (80s) and 7000 systems, but if I would also consider the level
-
-
Aaah, a maximum of five links! That explains why BM6000 thread (in the vintage forum) was caught in the auto-moderation fishingnet :-) Hopefully a nice moderator will approve the thread some day :-)
-
Did you sell the charger?
-
Look what I found! It's in mint condition, not a single scratch. The blemishes found on some places (near the "phono 4" key, for example) was actually dirt and has now been removed. And even better: it functions perfectly. I'm pleased!
-
[quote user="leogenghis"]Where the 5 and 9 float sleekly just above their bases, the 10 is perched awkwardly on top of a thin pole[/quote] On the other hand, this makes the BV10 look more lightweight and I like that. The BV9 looks much more heavy, not only due to it's size but also due to its heavier fram and the low fitting of the stand
-
How do you know who it is? By the IP address?
-
How much did you pay for the MMC2 re-tipping?
-
Ah, here it is! http://www.beoworld.org/prod_details.asp?pid=613 I dont like the white frets, btw. :-)
|
|
|