I didn't mean the external design - I mean the insides, hence audio R&D design rather than industrial design

We are making the assumption that this is a Samsung collaboration based on its resemblance to the Samsung player. However, B&O didn't need to collaborate with anyone for the BS2, the outstanding feature of which was its exemplary sound quality. I worry that if B&O have simply re-badged someone else's player, it won't sound that great

Perhaps this picture wasn't meant to be distributed as marketing material, hence the manky hands

Henry: The 8GB Nano is about £140. The current price is £169. Do you have a friend at Apple that can get you a discount Henry? If so, I'll have one of the new Macbook Pros to be announced this week

Andy the 8GB nano is £169 so already the Beosound 6 would be trailing Apple in terms of storage space. However, the best selling nano currently is the £129 4GB version. On the face of it, Apple have already lost but, as Alex points out, B&O aren't necessarily competing with anyone. This is just their entry into this sector of the

I think Apple are going to sell many millions of these

jandyt, you're talking about the 2GB nano and the 80GB ipod as though the latter was the evolution of the former. It's not. The latest nano is 8GB. It's the full-sized, hard disc based ipod that's 80GB. They are two separate product lines. The Beosound 6 will be a competitor for the 8GB nano, not the 80GB ipod. That doesn't mean

I think he means 'What are the prizes for July?', Lee!

I believe Beolit was named because the first model was made from Bakelite

I'm not suggesting B&O or their agency should have to pay for their good press We know that that never happens but in publishing a bit of back-scratching never hurt either